Conservative Posts Alleged Name Of Rape Victim From Rolling Stone Story
Chuck Johnson, who we won’t link to, has published the name “Jackie” as being the alleged name of the victim in the Rolling Stone story. Rolling Stone retracted the story of a gang rape at UVA after a Washington Post story cast the allegations in doubt. Evan McMurray has this to say about it at Mediaite:
[su_csky_ad][su_center_ad]
If Johnson sounds knowledgable about fabrications, that may be because they seem to follow him around. Johnson was first heard from when he participated in a Daily Caller story about Senator Robert Menendez (D-NJ) and Dominican prostitutes that was later revealed to be a hoax. He was then accused by the state of Mississippi of paying witnesses to concoct stories of vote-buying in the MS GOP primary race. He then falsely claimed that slain teenager Michael Brown had a juvenile arrest record (followed by a post of Brown’s Instagram photos, which he claimed proved Brown’s “violent streak”). He was suspended from Twitter twice for publishing the addresses of the two Dallas nurses who contracted ebola, and then falsely accused nurse Kaci Hickox of hiding a supposedly nefarious connection to the CDC.
dave-dr-gonzo December 7th, 2014 at 6:07 pm
And just to make it clear: Chuck Johnson is not Charles Johnson, the smart and enjoyably snarky blogger behind Little Green Footballs, the best right-of-center political blog in the known Internets!
Wayout December 7th, 2014 at 6:40 pm
There is no rape victim as the alleged rape never happened. The story was a complete fabrication from beginning to end and this was as shoddy a piece of “journalism” as there ever was. Not only this one, but how about Lena Dunham’s big lie?
Anomaly 100 December 7th, 2014 at 7:48 pm
It’s called harassment. Actually his name is Chuck C.Johnson and he’s done similar things before. Moderate Republicans and Democrats can’t stand him. That leaves you. You stand alone on the wrong side again. By the way, blackmail is illegal.
Chuckles is a scammer. Hey I know, why don’t you donate money to him?
https://twitter.com/ChuckCJohnson/status/541648185966751744
mrsgunka December 7th, 2014 at 9:09 pm
How do we separate free speech from hate speech and punish those that cross that line. We have been a witness to the cross over to hate speech on Fox News for way too long under the guise of “Fair and Balanced” but so many don’t have the filter/knowledge to differentiate that it is just one-sided and all a hoax for political gain/anger.
Red Eye Robot December 7th, 2014 at 9:17 pm
And you guys were all broken up when Darren Wilson’s address was published by the NY Times, Oh and I remember the lefts outrage when Spike Lee tweeted George Zimmerman’s address…only it was the address of a retired florida couple who had to move because of death threats. Oh and who can forget how upset the left was when a New York newspaper published the names and addresses of gun owners.
Kick Frenzy December 8th, 2014 at 1:00 am
HI.
I’m a Lefty.
I just wanted to let you know, I thought all of those things were out of line.
Also regardless of the Zimmerman address being wrong… publishing an address is a line that isn’t to be crossed.
It endangers people… and the public.
None of it does any good.
Red Eye Robot December 9th, 2014 at 1:56 pm
those things were all done by lefties like yourself and were applauded by the left. there is an easy way to stop this, the left needs to STOP DOING IT
Kick Frenzy December 16th, 2014 at 7:09 pm
It’s not exclusively something done by Democrats, it’s just as bad coming from the other side.
It needs to stop, regardless of who’s doing it.
This shouldn’t be a partisan concern.
Red Eye Robot December 17th, 2014 at 12:17 pm
You guys say it needs to stop but you applaud the people on the left who do it.
Kick Frenzy December 20th, 2014 at 3:40 pm
Are you reading what I’m writing?
The only comments I’ve made are that it was wrong. No applause.
If I remember correctly, MSNBC was largely against it all as well.