Klayman: Obama Can’t Swear To The Constitution Because He’s A Muslim
[su_right_ad]Funny, I didn’t learn that the Constitution prohibits Muslims from swearing to it.
[su_thin_right_skyscraper_ad]Klayman claimed in an interview with Newsmax’s Steve Malzberg today that President Obama “sympathizes with the so-called Muslim faith” and “everything he does nearly is based on favoring his own people, which is Muslims and African Americans.”
“He thinks like a Muslim, he believes that he is a Muslim, he obviously does worship the Koran,” Klayman said. “He obviously is in fact biased against people who are not of his claimed religion and otherwise.”
He added that President Obama’s supposed Muslim faith makes him unable to swear allegiance to the Constitution.
“Given the fact that the president is a Muslim at heart and half-Muslim by birth, he can’t even swear to the Constitution because you have to swear on the Holy Bible of Judeo-Christians,” he explained. “This president obviously believes in Sharia law, and as a result he has no respect for this Constitution, which was founded by our founding fathers under Judeo-Christian principles.”
Suzanne McFly February 19th, 2015 at 8:09 pm
Why does it seem that the word Muslim is synonymous with anti-Christ.
burqa February 19th, 2015 at 9:35 pm
It’s a twisted logic often seen on the net. If you support someone, it means you have to defend everything they ever did or said, same if you oppose them.
One has to think the one you disagree with shares nothing in common with you and must necessarily agree with everyone you disagree with. We see this from some atheists, who seem to think that atheism is not merely not believing in a supreme being, but it also obligates them somehow to always attack people of faith and never, ever, ever find common ground or accept that people of faith do anything good, much less reach conclusions that reflect the overwhelming abundance of evidence. To admit as much seems to constitute a sort of betrayal to them.
The same thinking id found among many on the Right – they see anyone who carries out the American system which is intended to force competing factions to cooperate and compromise as betraying the cause.
On the Right are some who look around at their comrades and they see a lot of Christians so they feel that their opponents must not be Christians, despite massive evidence to the contrary. But, like the atheists I referred to, above, they have no problem with ignoring a massive amount of evidence that points to a contrary conclusion.
The Right has tried to monopolize Christianity, and on the Left we find people who seem to go along with this, despite the huge percentage of Democrats who are Christians and despite the many leading figures on the Left who have been Christians. It’s twisted thinking.
Both on the Right and the atheists I referred to above, is another denial of reality in that they see no difference between Catholics, Quakers, Baptists, Mormons, Seventh Day Adventists or others. They just lump them into one group in order to employ that symptom of the lazy, bigoted mind – stereotypes.
Dwendt44 February 20th, 2015 at 12:42 am
Except, of course, I’ve yet to find an Atheist that acts or speaks as you claim. All those that I’m familiar with have no problem accepting christians doing good, doing the right thing, or acting in the best interest of the country or the world. Perhaps it’s your bigotry that needs examination.
NW10 February 19th, 2015 at 8:16 pm
http://i0.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/newsfeed/000/656/644/c14.jpg
Carla Akins February 19th, 2015 at 8:28 pm
How do those so far removed from reality get a public platform?
ExPFCWintergreen February 19th, 2015 at 10:06 pm
Yeah! (And where do I sign up?)
Carla Akins February 20th, 2015 at 4:36 am
I know, right. If I had known there was an opening for a lunatic to publicly rant – I would’ve signed up…..I mean I could get paid for this?
Larry Schmitt February 20th, 2015 at 9:37 am
No, you could never be crazy enough, even on purpose. They actually are that crazy.
Bunya February 19th, 2015 at 8:29 pm
Muslims. Jews, Buddhists, Atheists, etc. need not apply. JFK took a lot of flack for being Catholic and It seems that, not only do you have to be a christian in order to be eligible for the presidency, you have to be a certain TYPE of christian.
whatthe46 February 19th, 2015 at 8:30 pm
and white as far as they are concerned. oh, and not a woman.
burqa February 19th, 2015 at 10:58 pm
We have a liberal black Christian president.
Non-whites and women have been seen as viable candidates for the presidency for some time now.
Hillary, Elizabeth Warren, Palin, Bachmann, Colin Powell, Bobby Jindahl, Joe Lieberman, and a lot of people don’t think the Latter Day saints is a Christian church.
Don’t cut Americans short.
We’re getting better and a strong non-white or female or non-Christian can win if they are a good enough politician.
Bigotry has not disappeared and we have a ways to go, but have faith in America.
whatthe46 February 19th, 2015 at 11:09 pm
nicely said burqa. its not America as a whole i speak of… its these idiots.
Bunya February 20th, 2015 at 3:12 pm
and I forgot to add gays. You know how republican Jesus hates gays.
burqa February 19th, 2015 at 9:18 pm
Here we got this kook from NewsMax and right here in Liberaland right next to it is an ad for Newsmax so we can read more of their garbage….
jasperjava February 19th, 2015 at 9:22 pm
Synonyms.
ExPFCWintergreen February 19th, 2015 at 10:00 pm
Hey Larry, don’t look now, but Article 2, Section 1, Paragraph 8 of your beloved — though obviously completely misunderstood — Constitution stipulates that the President of the United States “shall take the following Oath or Affirmation:—”I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my Ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.” No Bible. No Judeo-Christian argle-bargle. No “god.” I know that’s a real bummer, but it was put in there in the name of … wait for it! … “religious liberty,” because Quakers (who were a fairly important political constituency in post-Revolutionary America) read the Bible quite literally and as a result are enjoined in James 5:12 “above all things, my brethren, swear not, neither by heaven, neither by the earth, neither by any other oath: but let your yea be yea; and your nay, nay; lest ye fall into condemnation.” President Franklin Pierce did, in fact, affirm and not swear. I now return you to your regularly scheduled insanity.
ExPFCWintergreen February 19th, 2015 at 10:07 pm
I think the latter is a requirement for the former.
William February 19th, 2015 at 10:21 pm
Well kids it looks like the son of one of a *gasp* founding father was one of them thar’ Mooslims to.
whatthe46 February 19th, 2015 at 10:33 pm
there you go again. on target.
Dwendt44 February 20th, 2015 at 12:43 am
Not to mention that our first five presidents were NON christian, as was Lincoln and maybe Eisenhower.
fancypants February 20th, 2015 at 10:54 pm
Roosevelt just held his hand up ( no book at all ) shortly after j.madison was pronounced dead
majii February 20th, 2015 at 5:04 am
Klayman is dumber that a box of rocks. Barack Obama swore to uphold the Constitution twice in a public venue while millions, maybe billions, around the world watched him take the Oath of Office.
Larry Schmitt February 20th, 2015 at 9:40 am
And one more thing. Even if he were Muslim, he wouldn’t “worship the Koran,” anymore than Christians worship the bible. Although the way some of them talk about it, maybe they do.
Dwendt44 February 20th, 2015 at 11:56 am
Worship? Maybe. Read it, why bother.
StoneyCurtisll February 20th, 2015 at 10:20 am
KKKlayman is a lunatic.
tracey marie February 20th, 2015 at 4:20 pm
this is hilarious.